From NY Times here:
And she said that if the department were “engaging in a widespread practice of unlawful stops, then an injunction seeking to curb that practice is not a ‘judicial intrusion into a social institution,’ but a vindication of the Constitution and an exercise of the courts’ most important function: protecting individual rights in the face of the government’s malfeasance.”
Checks and balances working in the post 9/11 era?
I think I just soiled myself.
I’m sure Emperor Bloomberg will have something dismissive and insulting to say about this ruling, but fear not, he’s just a tiny man with a shrivelled penis in control of the 7th largest standing army in the world.
